Construction – Mitigation
Approximately 30% of the energy consumed in Finland is used by buildings. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and real estate is based on reducing the consumption of energy and improving energy efficiency as well as replacing fossil energy with renewable energy. Heating, ventilation, hot water and lighting consume the most energy. In Finland, heating of buildings causes 30% of the greenhouse gas emissions.
New building as low energy or passive houses
In the case of new buildings, there is decisive possibility to reduce the heating need of a building. All new construction should be implemented as low energy or passive houses in which the need for heating energy is reduced as much as possible with reasonable costs. Implementing zero energy buildings is possible even in Finland. Use of wood as construction material stores carbon and thus reduces greenhouse gas emissions caused by construction.
Renovation, adjustment and monitoring of energy use
In renovation, the goal should be to at least halve energy consumption. Most cost effective means include heat recovery improvement solutions implemented in the ventilation system. Ventilation causes approximately half of the heat loss of buildings. Approximately 20% of heat is carried away with hot tap water.
To improve a building's energy efficiency, important parts are played by the adjustment and control of heating, ventilation, water consumption and lighting in accordance with need. Saving measures are made more effective and the user motivated by reactive, real-time monitoring of consumption.
Renewable energy
District heating based on renewable energy is an ideal heating solution for buildings. Furthermore, the joint production of heat and electricity improves the efficiency of production. Outside the heating network, oil heating should be replaced by low emission heating methods such as the use of woodchips or ground heat. In houses heated with electricity, energy consumption can be evened out and reduced with the use of heat pumps, fireplaces and solar collectors.
The number of holiday houses increases rapidly and their significance in the consumption of electricity is already notable. Holiday houses should be designed and build so that they do not require continuous heating. Otherwise, the same energy saving measures apply to them as with other construction.
References , , , , , , ,
Checklist
Energy saving and energy efficiency: Has the municipality joined an energy efficiency agreement for municipalities (MEE) or an energy programme (Motiva)?
Energy efficiency agreement and energy programme
Strengths, factors in favour |
Costs, economic impacts |
According to the Energy Efficiency Committee, Finland can save vast amounts of energy by 2020. New automotive technology can save 8.5 TWh, tighter regulations for new building and renovation building save 4.9 TWh, more challenging energy efficiency agreements 2.8 TWh and energy performance requirements for appliances 2.1 TWh. |
+ Energy efficiency measures pay back rapidly. |
The state authorities (MEE, Motiva) and the municipal sector (Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities) have created functioning instruments (energy efficiency agreement, energy programme, climate protection campaign) to support efforts to enhance the energy efficiency of municipalities and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. |
+ They also promote employment and enhance energy safety. Investment in energy efficiency promotes the development of technology, which also has employment-providing impacts. |
The best ways to save energy and enhance energy efficiency, and thus reduce greenhouse gas emissions, are identified. |
+ The government offers support for energy efficiency audits (40–50%) and energy saving investments (15–20%). |
The municipality gains an energy issue teaching package for staff training purposes. |
+/- Programme preparation and monitoring require efforts, even if the costs incurred are not high in the end. |
|
- Costs may initially increase as investments are made. |
Information and communication: How is the local grid company managing energy efficiency services?
Grid company's energy efficiency services
Strengths, factors in favour |
Costs, economic impacts |
An energy audit of a building is suitable for examining the energy saving potential of business or service premises with ordinary technical building systems. It also lends itself for use as the audit method of a large building or one with complicated technology - e.g. a hospital or public indoor swimming pool. |
+ Energy audit aims at evaluating economically profitable energy saving measures. |
At the same time, possibilities for using renewable energy can be examined. |
+/- Initial investments may be high, but in some cases results can be attained even without investment. Energy saving pays back the investment. |
Support for audits of a municipality's housing stock is available from the Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland (ARA). |
- Conducting of analyses requires efforts. |
|
+ Support for audits of a municipality's housing stock is available from the Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland (ARA). |
Information and communication: Is communication on energy saving organised for municipality residents and holiday home owners? Do local authorities know the building stock and its heating systems? Are residents and businesses willing to engage in energy saving?
Communication on energy saving
Strengths, factors in favour |
Weaknesses, uncertainties |
Costs, economic impacts |
If implemented well, energy communications targeted at residents, focussing on cost savings, produces results. |
In some cases it is not possible to enhance the efficiency of the heating solution in use. Instead, it is more reasonable to replace the system with another. |
+ Enhancing the efficiency of existing heating solutions costs less than the introduction of an all new system. Energy saving will soon pay back the costs. |
|
|
+ Servicing and repair of heating systems increase employment in the sector and prevent the generation of higher costs. |
|
|
+ Costs of communications are low in relation to the benefit gained. |
Energy saving and energy efficiency: Have energy audits been conducted at municipal buildings?
Energy audit of a building
Strengths, factors in favour |
Costs, economic impacts |
An energy audit of a building is suitable for examining the energy saving potential of business or service premises with ordinary technical building systems. It also lends itself for use as the audit method of a large building or one with complicated technology - e.g. a hospital or public indoor swimming pool. |
+ Energy audit aims at charting economically profitable energy saving methods. |
At the same time, possibilities for using renewable energy can be examined. |
+/- Initial investments may be high, but in some cases results can be attained even without investment. Energy saving pays back some of the investments. |
Support for audits of a municipality's residential stock is available from the Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland (ARA). |
- Conducting of analyses requires efforts. |
|
+ Support for audits of a municipality's residential stock is available from the Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland (ARA). |
Renewable energy: Is the district heat alternative based on renewable energy (e.g. wood chips, straw, biogas) examined? Do energy production plants in the region use fossil fuels? Could they be replaced with bio-based fuels, partly or completely?
Replacing fossil fuels with biofuels
Strengths, factors in favour |
Weaknesses, uncertainties |
Costs, economic impacts |
The structure of energy production changes into an ecologically sustainable direction. |
The use of logging residue as an energy source may impoverish the forest's nutrient and carbon reserves. |
+ Employment for local timber harvesting and transport entrepreneurs |
Increases the degree of domestic origin in energy supply and facilitates the use of locally sourced fuels. |
Increasing use of wood fuel may reduce the biodiversity of forests. |
+ Large energy plants can in some cases gain profits by selling emissions allowances (emissions trading in the EU). |
More local employment opportunities (timber harvesting and transports) |
The different characteristics of biofuels in comparison with fossil fuels require additional space. |
+/- The availability and price competitiveness of biofuels decide the level (the share) individual plants reach in using them. |
When peat is replaced, acidifying, eutrophicating nitrogen emissions causing particulate matter emissions will decrease. |
Extensive utilisation of forest for energy may result in unsustainable forestry. |
- With current price ratios, the use of biofuels is not economically sensible from the viewpoint of large plants. |
Logging residue recovered from the forest for reclamation. |
Environmental nuisance caused by transports may increase. |
- May require considerable new investment at large plants. |
|
Wood-processing industry production costs may rise due to increasing competitive demand for wood. |
- May result in rising raw material costs in wood-processing industry. |
Contracts and programmes: Has your municipality joined the municipal climate protection campaign launched by the Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities? If not, has your municipality calculated its greenhouse gas emissions, decided on goals for reducing emissions, and prepared a programme monitoring greenhouse gas emissions in another context?
Joining the municipal climate protection campaign
Strengths, factors in favour |
Weaknesses, uncertainties |
Costs, economic impacts |
Commit municipal actors to long-term objectives. |
Progress of strategies and programmes must be systematically monitored. Otherwise their benefits may not be attained. |
+ Climate strategy can bring indirect cost-savings e.g. through energy conservation. An energy efficiency agreement brings direct savings. |
Indicate concrete measures that facilitate the mitigation of climate change on the municipal level. |
Setting of numeric objectives may prove challenging, both technically and politically. |
- Costs may increase at least initially as investments are made. |
|
|
+/- Preparation of strategy and programmes, and their monitoring require efforts, even if the costs incurred are not high in the end. |
|
|
+ The government offers support for energy efficiency audits (40–50%) and energy saving investments implemented (15–20%). |